Thursday, June 29, 2006

Electra under the weather

As promised, here's what Electra looked like when the problem was rampant. Notice the lines all over the background image. My Mormon zombie babes are supposed to be crisp and clear:

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Life with Electra


STIPIMM: "I Should Be Allowed to Think," by They Might Be Giants

The life of a videographer/editor nowadays is completely wrapped up in computing and the digital world. Whether we like it or not, our ability to do our jobs is based in large part in the quality of our computers. Where people in my profession once oohed and ahhed mostly over cameras, lenses, film stock and the like, nowadays filmmakers are just as likely to go ga-ga for a new super-charged computer systems or some new features in editing software.

I am no stranger to this. I have regularly remarked to myself that it is strange that, as a film/videomaker, the only magazine to which I religiously subscribe is Macworld, not American Cinematographer, not Filmmaker Magazine, not even Entertainment Weekly (birthday and Christmas gift hints…ahem). And usually, reading Macworld is an exercise in wishful thinking -- my budget has no leeway for new systems or even souped-up new peripherals. But it does one good to dream, I suppose.

Besides, I have had pretty much all I really needed to do my work, from shooting to editing. At the center of this is my Apple G4 Powerbook, which goes by the name Electra. When I bought her several years ago, she was of course the top of her line -- fast, efficient, glitch-free. It was one of the best investments I ever made, second maybe only to my Canon GL2 video camera. She has served me well ever since the day she arrived on my doorstep. However, I fear that her remaining days with me are numbered, and this worries me and my pocketbook greatly.

Even though she's worked well overall, life with Electra hasn't been all peachy. Indeed, sometimes I think she's held together with baling string and duct tape. Here are some of the problems that Electra has had and continues to have:

   1) About a year after purchasing her, for no reason that I could figure, the DVD drive stopped working. Whenever I tried to insert a disk, it just spit it right back out at me. This was an especially bad problem because I burned a hell of a lot of CDs and DVDs in my time. Instead of buying a new drive and paying for installation, I found a cheaper work-around and bought an external DVD burner. That solution's worked very well ever since, although it is sometimes still a pain.
   2) About half a year after the DVD drive went kaput, the Airport card slot stopped working. Now, for those of you who don’t know Macs, the Airport is Apple's wireless system. The Airport card is what the laptop uses to communicate with a wireless Internet connection. And now that wasn't working on Electra, so I couldn't connect wirelessly to the Internet. Again in this case, instead of paying for a repair, I went the cheap and inconvenient route -- I connect to the Internet through an Ethernet cable, just as one would with a desktop computer.
   3) When I first bought her and ran Final Cut Pro on her, she was fast and furious. But, as software inevitably does, further editions of Final Cut Pro (the video editing software I use most [don't tell my employer!]) got more complicated, and thus ran more slowly on my computer. It begs the question, why didn't you just stick with the older version… and well, there's an argument to be made for that. However, with "Commit to the Line," and other stuff, it was beneficial to update the software, and (especially with "Commit") I had the opportunity to upload the software for free, which was a hard offer to pass up.
   4) I took Electra all sorts of places, even on vacation sometimes, and the physical wear and tear has taken its toll. Beyond cosmetic nicks and abrasions, the latch that holds her shut finally stopped closing late last year. Then, one day a few months ago, she fell out of the car (making my heart stop for a few seconds), and damaged (but didn't break!) one of the hinges that holds the screen to the computer. Now, opening her up is a delicate process, lest I damage the hinge further.
   5) Her battery, having gone through more charge cycles than I can count, is next to worthless. You can't use her without plugging her in for more than 15 minutes at a time.

Electra has become more of a desktop machine, i.e., I don't really take her around too much, in part because it would add to the wear and tear, and in part because of the issues above (especially the battery). But all these issues, in the grand scheme of things, are relatively minor. She still runs all the software that's on her very well.

A couple of weeks ago, however, a new issue arose that couldn't be as easily glossed over and worked around. Electra's screen began getting these funky looking striations on them, all over the screen. It started pretty mildly, with only a little bit of problem here or there, but it progressively got worse over the course of a day. Rebooting didn't help. Shutting her down for a day didn't help either. None of the standard troubleshooting techniques helped.

I was going to load up a picture of this problem, but for some reason I can't find the one I took last week… I'll have to load it later. But trust me, it was bad. My best guess as to the source of the problem was a dying video card, which as any computer person can tell you is not an easy or cheap thing to fix. I was able to do some things with Electra, but photo and graphics work was impossible, and perhaps most importantly, doing video work was an eye-strain-inducing ordeal.

Indeed, it was this last point that was really the most worrisome. Electra is my lifeblood when it comes to editing, and without her, some of the projects I'm working on would pretty much be dead in the water. With the problem getting worse with no signs of improvement, I sat Bridget down and introduced her to a grim reality -- if Electra died outright or this problem continued, we'd have to start looking at getting a new computer.

And getting a new computer that can do the things I need it to is almost as big a deal (money-wise) as buying a used car. If you're going to get a new computer, you better get a darn good one, because buying something lower on the ladder of quality will just make it obsolete that much quicker. And a darn good computer in my industry costs anywhere from $2,500 to $3,500.

There's the obvious question: do you really need a computer right away? Short answer, no, but soon. There's just no realistic way I can do editing, graphics work and all the various stuff I do without a good computer. It's like my friend Imogen's recent issues with her car -- if it were up to her, she'd make do with her broken car or just doing without, but because she has to travel around in her job, it's a necessity to have a reliable car. So too with filmmaking and computers.

But of course, we don't have $2,500 just sitting around -- if we did, it would be going straight to the still-not-fully-funded "Indian Girl" film project. We'd have to tap into credit once more, which is not a last-resort option, to be sure, but a necessary one.

But then, just as I was starting to despair over the situation and preparing myself for the necessity of a major purchase (and yet secretly relishing the idea of a powerful new machine), Electra started showing signs of improvement late last week. Out of nowhere, applications that were once illegible were showing up crisp and clean. Pretty soon, everything was back to looking normal. The picture at the top of the post was taken this morning and shows how Electra looks now (you'll be able to compare it to how she looked when she was sick when I post the picture).

So, what happened? Hell if I know. The only thing that I can figure might have happened is that I downloaded some intensive database software a few weeks ago (it was for the nightmare film project I blogged about last week). I removed it last week thinking maybe, just maybe it was causing the problem. And so… now the problem's gone. Could it have been that software? Maybe…but I still don’t know how it caused it. Of course, Andrew and Marianne's computer (which used to be mine) has recently had a different kind of screen problem that seemed to magically work itself out over the weekend. Did the laptop fairies finally get around to visiting Massachusetts and sprinkling their pixie dust over all the computers of all the good boys and girls of the commonwealth?

Now that she's back to running normally, I'm handling her very delicately. I've told Bridget not to shut her down outright, for fear that it might trigger a relapse. Basically, it's a wait-and-see approach for the time being, tiptoeing around her, keeping my fingers crossed, and trying not to do anything to piss her off (kind of like how I handle my marriage…). With any luck, she'll last until next year when we can make a plan about buying a new machine. In the meantime, I'll keep reading Macworld and dreaming…

Thursday, June 22, 2006

"I have nothing to offer anyone except my own confusion..."

STIPIMM: “Stuck In a Moment You Can’t Get Out Of,” by U2

My nerves were relatively smooth throughout the day Monday. I had an occasional moment of stomach-tightening, but for some reason, I was able to compartmentalize the performance and not think about it much while I was at work.

This changed once I got home to get ready and pick up Bridget to go to the show. The jitters were definitely there, but they were still very manageable. Performance anxiety has never been debilitating for me, but it has certainly tapered off in recent years. A large part of that is certainly my experience in teaching, which is essentially a performance of another kind in front of an easily bored audience. Nonetheless, the nerves started to mount, so much so that I forgot my headshot, which I had spent an inordinate amount of time procuring (since I didn't really have one before).

We zipped in Phoebe to the theatre and got there with plenty of time to spare. The theatre itself was ImprovBoston, a tiny little black box space that, surprise, primarily housed improvisational comedy groups. At its maximum, it could hold about 100 people. When we got inside, Courtney, who was both producer and actress in the show, was running herself ragged trying to get last-minute things in order. She had warned us that she was a terror before a show, so Liz and I both respectably kept our distances and let her do her thing. Bridget often says she's a pain to be around before a show, but Bridget never threatened to sue a tattoo parlor before a show of hers premiered.*

The three of us actor-types settled down in the green room, which was essentially the low-ceilinged basement below the theatre. The gals did their makeup while I lounged about on the couches. It was at that time that I got the only decent photo I was able to get that evening. I had brought my camera in the hope that there would be time before or after the show to get some pics of the play, but alas, the green-room shot was all I really got.

The actresses prepare (Liz on the left,
Courtney on the right).

Anyway, at 15 'til 8, the fact that we were about to go on stage really sunk in and we started our own little nervous preparation idiosyncrasies. Liz and I wandered around the basement; I managed to find a door that led outside (separate from the one that led to the stage), which made me chain-smoking Courtney's best friend for a while. Courtney alternately smoked and went up to check on the audience. The sales had gone pretty well, and I suppose the audience was half-full (strangely enough, despite being in the room for an hour and a half, I never once took full stock of how many people were there -- I was acting, dammit… if you want details, ask Bridget).

Finally, it was time to get up to the stage and ready to go. Courtney gave us a last thanks and an order to "have fun." Liz did some goofy-cool superstition thing in which she touched all our noses with her thumb (you had to be there to understand). And up we went, down went the lights, and out we scurried to perform.

The play opens with Jonas (me!) and Nona (Liz) sitting in a row of five chairs in the middle of the stage. Nona's in the middle reading** a National Geographic Magazine, and I'm on the far right (looking from the audience), doodling on my arm with a pen. This last detail in the script had been causing me some trouble, because Jonas is supposed to have been apparently doodling on his arm "for some time," which meant there had to be a lot of stuff already on his arm when the lights went up. So, I spent much of my day at work on Monday doodling on my arm, trying various sorts of pens (FYI, Bic ball-points are horrible for writing on your skin!) and all sorts of images. By the evening, I had everything from a sketch of a girl in a bikini to a guy hanging himself in a tree. Bridget also wrote her Kiowa name (Thol-ma) on my arm along with our wedding date.

But I digress. So the two of us are sitting there and out comes Abby (Courtney), fresh out of the snow and looking for a place to sit. She sits on the other end of the chairs (far left) and proceeds to try to strike up a conversation with the rather asocial Nona. I sit listening for six pages (approximately six minutes) continuing my doodling.

And finally, it's my time to speak. According to Bridget, it was clear that I was nervous in the first minute of my dialogue (which basically means that I stumbled over my lines a little bit at first, which I do remember doing), but once it got going, I was fine. And like I said last time, I pretty much don't shut up the entire time. In the first act, I regale the two girls with lots of tall tales about my cross-country adventures, confront Nona about the cold feet she has over her pending nuptials, get the naïve Abby drunk, and after she passes out, I make a concerted pass at Nona, which I abandon just as it's about it bear fruit, earning me a slap in the face at the end of the act.

The first act went very smoothly, if I remember correctly. There was only two areas of dialogue that we missed -- unfortunately one of them was one of my favorite parts of the play, in which drunk Abby gives Jonas a lap dance ("Abby, Jonas wants you to stop." "No, actually, it's okay. She's making a point; let's see where she's going with this. She wants people to know she's not boring."). But missing that part didn't trip us up any.

The other part we missed did trip us up, but according to Bridget and others, it wasn't noticeable from the audience. It happened just as Abby passes out from her drunkenness and Nona and Jonas have to carry her over to sleep it off on the chairs. The carrying is what threw us off -- it's a complicated little procedure in the first place, but it got a little bit more complicated by pure chance: we put her body down on the chairs just such that her head fell between two chairs. And so, we spent an extra few silent seconds (which seemed like an eternity to Liz and me) repositioning a chair so her passed-out head would have some place to fall. Sounds silly, but it did throw us off a bit. I said my line a little bit differently than I had before, and as a result, Liz omitted a key part of her next line, a part that was necessary for my next line to make any sense at all. So… we looked at each other, sticking to the flabbergastedness our characters were feeling, and tried to figure out what to say next. I finally found it, but it ended up omitting a page of dialogue. Not crucial, but still. And that was the only moment in the entire performance where I felt any panic, but I think we both handled it just fine. And most importantly, the audience (or so says Bridget) didn't notice.

During intermission, we were relieved we got through the bulk of the play in one piece (2/3 of the play is in act one), but we went over the first part of the dialogue of the second act. In rehearsals, act two had been our Achilles' heel -- one or more of us (and all three of us were guilty) would forget our lines or lose our place. It's easy to understand why -- there's a lot more going on in terms of action and interplay in the second act, and a lot more to keep track of.

We did it as well as we ever had, though. The first part of the act revolves around Nona's and Jonas' revelations to the others about their feelings about their lives (Nona doesn't really want to get married, but is afraid not to; Jonas doesn't know what the hell to do with his life, so tries out different identities to find one he likes). After Abby staggers off to "throw up everything I've eaten since I was twelve," Nona and a reluctant Jonas go through Abby's luggage to see if there are any clues as to why she's so weird. They find five Ziplock bags full of some mysterious gray powder that Nona quickly determines to be drugs. She convinces Jonas to try some, going so far as to shove a handful of the stuff in his mouth (thus creating a very humorous mess on my face and shirt). When Abby returns and catches Nona and Jonas red- (or gray-) handed, we find out that they weren't drugs at all, but the ashes of her dead boyfriend which she wanted to spread out in every state in the country (she had five states to go). Nona pretty much knew that they were cremains, but had decided to feed them to Jonas anyway to get back at him for his act-one manipulations. Abby screams at Jonas, Jonas faces the realities of barbecue cannibalism, and Nona sits back and gloats. However, with all that's going on, Abby (of all people) has finally put the pieces together: why Jonas and Nona have been stuck at the bus station for weeks; why none of them can really remember how they got there; and why they all seem to be in the same "going-nowhere" situation in their lives. They're dead, and they're stuck together in what they can only guess is a purgatory or limbo. However, just as they all make this realization and start to come to terms with it, their reality shifts, and they return to their positions at the start of the play: Jonas doodling on his arm, Nona pretending to read, and Abby trying to start up conversation. The dialogue is the same as the beginning of the play, and indeed, we are led to understand that the trio are in a perpetual loop of re-examining their lives, realizing their hopeless fates, and then starting it all over again. And they lived happily ever after.

And like I said, we did act two very well. There was only one hiccup, and it was easily pushed through, just as the first hiccup in act one. I had the last line of the play (at least the last line before the cycle began again), and it's a quote of Jack Kerouac's. The line is in answer to Nona's imploring questions about what the heck they're supposed to do now that they realize that they're stuck in this purgatory. Jonas says, "I don't know. I have nothing to offer anyone except my own confusion."*** I spent a while during rehearsal trying to figure out how to say this damn line, and I never quite figured it out. Well, it showed. I didn't nail the line, like I had been hoping to do. As Bridget put it, "You were trying too hard," and she was quite right. Instead of just saying it, I tried to say it. Lesson learned.

But despite a problematic last line, the production overall was a success. After Abby says the real last line of the play ("Abigail Marie Fenton. What's yours?"), the lights went down, we got up, and the lights went back up for us to take our quick group bow. We hurried off stage and down to the green room where we cheered and celebrated. Courtney pulled out a bottle of champagne for a tradition that her theatre company has of having a champagne toast at the end of the final performance of a show (and since this was a one-night-only gig…). After some hugs and some post-show milling about, Bridget and I went out for dinner with Liz and her boyfriend, Mike. After that, we went home, and I slept something fierce.

It was an exhausting experience (though not nearly as exhausting as it was for poor Courtney), but I enjoyed every minute of it. Like I said in my last post -- it was a fulfillment of something I wanted to do for years. Ever since I was in a tiny little role in "Oklahoma!" at Rice, I felt that I had the drive and ability to hold my own starring in a theatrical show, and now I know it for a fact. I hope I get to do it again sometime soon…

* Courtney said that she suspected that this tattoo parlor, one of the places that was selling tickets to the show, had been selling photocopies of tickets and pocketing the money. Not sure if it turned out to be true…
** Actually, she's holding it, but not reading it. Jonas had been staring over her shoulder for a half-hour and she's been on the same page the whole time. So he's thinking to himself, 1) this chick's really into Bengal Tigers and wants to get the full effect of the article; 2) she's completely illiterate and it takes her forever to read; or 3) the most likely option, she's not reading it at all, she's just staring at it and thinking about something else. Or 4) her parents didn't give her enough affection as a child.
*** "I had nothing to offer anyone except my own confusion." is from "On the Road," part two, chapter four.

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

Pretending

STIPIMM: “Yesterday,” by the Beatles

This past Monday night, June 19, I got to do something I’ve essentially wanted to do since I was in college – act in a play. It was a play called “Gin, Love & Kerouac,” by a young lass named Courtney Baia. She also produced the play through her theatre company, Peripitus Theatre Co., and played one of the three roles.

I first got involved with this play, just as I get involved with everything these days, through a Craig’s List posting for an audition. I prepared a couple of short monologues (with the help of my patient wife) and went to the audition, which was held in Courtney’s apartment (such is low-budget theatre). I really wasn’t expecting to get the part, not because I didn’t think I did decently, but because I figured there was probably someone who did better. Turns out, they offered me the role two days later, and I quickly accepted.

Well, let’s back up a second here. Some of you are probably surprised that I was seeking out being in a play in the first place. Truth is, I’ve been fascinated with theatre and acting for as long as I can remember, long before I met a certain girl who was particularly involved in it. Theatre have long been this pseudo-sacred area for me – a near-ritualistic gathering to watch people re-create or completely invent a reality. It was only in the past seven or eight years or so that I began to recognize the importance and respect I attached to the performing arts, and the disdain I feel when people half-ass it, disrespect it, or treat it like a second-class pursuit.

Indeed, when I met Bridget, it was a large part of the mystique that I felt surrounding her – she was a Director with a capital D, not like the technicians I was working with in my film program, but someone who took acting and the art of theatre seriously. Even as she did small productions to occasionally spartan audiences in Washington, DC, there was something that elevated it in my mind above anything anyone at AU’s film program was doing.

A couple of years ago, when Bridget took a directing class at Studio Theatre, I decided to try my hand at a basic acting course. I enjoyed it a lot and did fine in it. I certainly did better than most of the people in the class, which wasn’t necessarily saying much, but still made me feel good about the thought of actually acting in something. But one thing that the class showed me that I hadn’t fully realized before was that I had something in me that has been in me since… oh… I was in middle school: the ability and willingness to turn off my self-consciousness in the interest of performing for an audience. It’s one of the more basic things about acting – being willing to look stupid – and I seem to have it. Now, it’s a big leap from there to Brando, but at least I had that much. There were plenty of people I had seen in college and community theatre that didn’t even have that.

So anyway, that was the seed of confidence that allowed me to 1) perform in Day Old Plays over a year ago in Washington, DC; and 2) try out for a play in a town I had only lived in for seven months. I try to have no illusions about my abilities – you won’t see me trying out for anything more than small theatre stuff anytime soon. But it seemed like “Gin, Love & Kerouac” was something I could do… and I was right.

So anyway, back to the play at hand. This being a brand new play, there wasn’t much of a way to know exactly how good the play was going to be before I accepted and got a copy of it. I suppose I should thank my lucky stars that it turned out to be pretty darn good. The entire play takes place in the course of an evening in a bus station in Illinois. There are three characters, one young man and two young women, who are stuck at the bus station by an extraordinarily heavy snowstorm. They get to talking, as should happen in any decent play, and the things they reveal about themselves eventually point to a common thread between their lives. In between, they flirt, dance, get drunk, ingest biohazardous materials, and debate the merits of Jack Kerouac.

I played Jonas Ashley, a 19-year-old (go ahead, get your laughter out now) who dropped out of college and decided to travel across the country like his hero Kerouac. He is constantly playing with his identity, telling stories that would more befit a seasoned world traveler than a minor-aged wannabe beat. Besides these notable aspects of his character, he also really, really likes to talk. Once he starts talking on page 7 of this 97-page-long play, there are only a few places where he’s not intimately involved in the dialogue. Indeed, I ran a digital copy of the script through my script analysis program, and Jonas has 40% of the dialogue of the play, along with three near-page-long-stretches that count as monologues.

So, here I was, a 31-year-old introvert being asked to play a 19-year-old garrulous, flirty guy. A bit of a challenge, but I accepted it and memorized my lines well.

There are two other roles in the play, both played by young women. The first one, Abby, who is a throwback to the 50s in how deferential she is to the men in her life, was played by Courtney herself. The other, Nona, an anti-social conservative gal who’s on her way back home to get married, was originally going to be played by a friend of Courtney’s, but she had to drop out a couple of months ago (for whatever reason), and Courtney had to scramble to find a replacement. She asked me if I knew anyone willing and able to fill in, and I turned to the theatrical resource I had in Bridget for advice. I ended up asking one of the actresses in Bridget’s production of “Crave,” Liz Rimar, if she would play Nona. And to my surprise, after she met with Courtney, she said yes. This was both good and bad – it was good that we found someone good to be in the play, but it scared the bejeezus out of me at first, because she is someone who I respected and already knew could… well, actually act, and here I was, a wannabe, going to be trying to act next to her. A little bit daunting, but still, I like Liz a lot, and she’s about as stuck up as Jesus, so the initial worry didn’t last long.

The rehearsal process and the performance was a bit different than a typical theatre run. In that way, it was more in line with what is known as a “workshop” production, in that there were limited rehearsals and only one performance night (Bridget’s productions in D.C., for instance, had weeks of performances). Even as a workshop production, our timeline was a bit compressed; we only rehearsed this past Saturday and Sunday for 10 hours each day.

Another unusual (or experimental, as Courtney put it) aspect of the production was that there was no director. The actors were to essentially create their own roles and characterizations from their own work and the rehearsal time with the other actors.

Bridget still smarts a little from the characterizations of directing made by Brian Friel, the playwright of her last play, “Dancing at Lughnasa” (he said something akin to: directors aren’t really necessary; all you need are good actors and a decent stage manager and you have what you need for good theatre). And as someone who is studying directing, it’s understandable that she would be skeptical about a theatrical process that eschewed a formal director. She grumbled about it some, but she was overall very supporting and helped me in the long process of memorization and trying to develop some character for this Jonas fellow.

The rehearsals were long and hot; most of them were done in Courtney’s living room (again, theatre on the cheap!), which had no air conditioner. But it was clear by the end of the first day that we were well on our way to getting this thing together, and the second day was focused on particular gaps in our memory, our blocking and our characterizations. It was whirlwind and exhausting, but a lot of fun nonetheless.

And then, we were as ready as we were going to be for Monday night…

more tomorrow...

Monday, June 19, 2006

A sketchy film project

STIPIMM: “How Much is That Doggie in the Window,” by Bob Merrill

A month, huh?

Last weekend, I extricated myself from what was becoming a very frustrating film situation.

Early this year, when I was still working at H&R Block, my slate was pretty much clear as far as doing films was concerned. I was seriously worried about my ability to get work in my chosen industry, even if it didn’t pay much at first. Now that I have two teaching gigs lined up, am working for the biggest film editing software maker, and am directly or tangentially involved in several different film projects, it’s kind of hard to remember how worried I was, but I was indeed concerned that I was going to be stuck taking various ho-hum jobs in graphic design or layout.

It was in this worrisome environment that I first answered to an ad on Craig’s List looking for a production manager and editor (two separate positions) for a feature-length film that was being produced in New Hampshire. It was advertised as a “paid job,” which made it all the more attractive. So, I answered the ad, offering my services for both positions and looking to find out more about the project.

The producer called me back the next day and, to my astonishment, was ready to hire me on the spot. I was not entirely committal, but I did express interest, wanting to know a little bit about the film and the details. She told me that it was a low-budget horror picture* and would be filming this fall. Other details were yet to be determined, and I tentatively agreed to be on board. We didn’t talk about pay or anything like that, because well, I’m used to waiting until a face-to-face interview or follow-up phone call to ask things like that when you’re looking for a job. I had no idea that this phone call was going to encompass the entire hiring process.

As I hung up the phone (can we say that anymore – I pushed “end” on my cell phone…), my spidey sense was tingling like crazy. I had been a production manager on a feature film before and was intimately knowledgable of how all this worked, and there were several things that made the red lights flash:

-- She was willing to hire the production manager (PM), perhaps the most important position in the pre-production of a feature film, after only having seen my resume and talked to me for a minute on the phone. I’ve had cases where someone was hiring for a one-day gig and talked to me on the phone for half-an-hour before even hinting that I was hired.
-- The details of the movie itself were sketchy, and a script wasn’t expected until summer (it’s hard to plan for something when you don’t know what you’re planning for…).
-- In general, the producer was not interested in discussing details. Indeed, she talked at a mile-a-minute, and always seemed to be ready to get off the phone (even if she wasn’t actively trying to get off the phone)

But I went along with things anyway. Such is me, especially at that time when things, like I said, were so uncertain. And more than that, I was happy to have a chance to be a production manager again on a feature film. The first time I was a PM was for a movie in D.C., and as Bridget can tell you, it was one of the more painful and stressful (albeit educational and ultimately rewarding) experiences of my life. I was looking forward to being able to apply what I had learned from all my mistakes in the previous film to another film.

The producer called me a couple of days later to ask me a couple of questions about my editing system and if I was on board. I said I was, and we talked a little more about details. Not to overuse the word, but they were sketchy. There were going to be meetings with crew in the summer, and the filming itself was set for such and such weekends in fall. She was assembling cast and crew (a task that usually falls on the production manager to organize, and with good reason). That should have sent up another red flag, but more on that later. And then, almost in passing, as we were about to hang up, she mentioned that I would get separate deferred pay points for the PM and editor jobs.

And at that moment, I should have turned down the gig and ran. For those of you who don’t know how these things work, a lot of independent films choose to, for obvious budgetary reasons, defer the pay of cast and crew by giving them “points,” which is to say, percentage points of the film’s profit, if there is any. So, for instance, if this film had made $10,000 in profit, and I had 5 points, then I would have received a check for $500.

Deferred pay is not an unusual situation in indie filmmaking and no one usually has any illusions about the reality of getting paid – in most cases, the film you’re working on will not make a profit and you’ll get nothing except an entry on your resume and a DVD for your collection. But there is one unspoken rule about it: you are always upfront about it, and you NEVER claim it’s a “paid gig.” When a professional reads “paid” without the word “deferred” before it, he/she assumes that there is a paycheck at the end of the day. Such is what I assumed, until I was told, in passing, that it was deferred.

Were I thinking clearly then, and were I not so desperate for work and a chance to redeem myself, I would have spotted this obviously unprofessional behavior and dropped it all. But I went along with it, since I really wasn’t doing it for the pay anyway, and it still sounded like a fun project.

Time passed, seasons changed…well, one season… and then the time for the first meeting rolled around – early May. Now, to this point, the producer had not included me in any discussion of things, and I didn’t think too much of it, because I didn’t think the production was getting started until this first meeting. I didn’t know what to expect at this first meeting, but I trusted that the producer and her assistant had some plans for it.

Well, that was a “sketchy” assumption. When I got to the meeting, the producer took the cast off to the side and we in the crew were pretty much just left there to, well, fend for ourselves. As production manager, I quickly recognized the chaos and took control; after that the meeting found some semblance of order. But still, I had not been informed as to the nature of the meeting, and had I not stepped up or hadn’t been able to attend (which was a real possibility), the crew members would have just sat around twiddling their thumbs until they finally decided to leave. Even with me calling things to order, I wasn’t in any position to really lead a meeting – I had to improvise on the spot, and since, like I said, details were “sketchy,” I was basically winging it. Under the circumstances, I think I did a superb job, but I’m sure most of the crew, some of whom had traveled from over 100 miles away, felt like they had wasted their time in coming… and I didn’t disagree.

After that meeting, it became clear that the producer wasn’t going to be telling me when and how to get things going, so I had to take it upon myself to basically start the thing from the ground up. And so I did. But what I was faced with was a mountain of chaos – principal crew members who had been hired with even less an interview than I had, and who had no contact or information about the film beyond a 1-minute phone call; some positions for which the producer had unwittingly hired multiple people; and perhaps most disastrously, professionals who were originally under the same impression that I had been – that this gig was truly “paid,” not deferred.

And my efforts were an overwhelming success. The second meeting, which was held two Fridays ago, was infinitely more organized and on track than that first debacle. I feel confident saying no one left that meeting with any major questions unanswered and feeling that the production wasn’t in good hands.

But while this meeting was successful overall, severe cracks were starting to appear. To take the next steps in the production, I was going to have to start keeping track of the budget and overseeing the script breakdown. On both these points I was stymied – first off, the script wasn’t freakin’ finished (and that script that was there was in serious need of trimming), and second, the producer was reticent to release any expenditure and budget information, and so there was no way I could speak knowledgably about the budget and make plans for spending (a fundamental aspect of being a PM). And to fill in the downtimes during the meeting, we put on a DVD of the last movie this producer did. I had not seen it before, and let’s just say it wasn’t pretty.

But the real kicker that finally put me over the edge was the fact that the producer was planning on spending $20,000 on this project, but had only raised $1,000 thus far. Whenever asked about the discrepancy, she would point to the script and say that once that came in (it was being written by someone I never met), then the fundraising could begin in earnest and the money would come in. Now, I like optimism as much as the next filmmaker, but this was beyond the pale ridiculous. I think it’s just a cardinal rule of business that you don’t count on money that’s not in the bank, and this was as fundamental a violation as you could get – even if the script winds up being great, there’s no immediate guarantee of funding, despite whatever contacts she thought she might have.

After the meeting was over, I told Bridget that, even with my working to get the thing organized, the movie had only a 50-50 chance of ever getting off the ground, simply because of the money situation (you can plan and be as optimistic as you want – if there’s no money, there’s no movie). The next morning, it struck me that I was working my ass off for a production that I wasn’t even confident was going to happen, and if it was going to happen, would wind up looking like the not-so-good movie that we showed at the meeting.

And so, I quit. The day after the meeting.

And it surprised the heck out of the producer, who struggled to understand why I was leaving, but finally accepted it. And I’m sure it’s going to surprise a lot of the crew members who saw me confidently leading the production just the day before. But it had to be done – for my own sake. Before, I was looking forward to several busy months of frustrating planning and orchestration, followed by a few fun weekends, and then editing a lackluster product. Now, with that weight off my shoulders, I can focus on the projects that really matter to me – Indian Girl and Commit to the Line (the documentary I started editing work on last year). And I learned an important lesson – no matter how desperate you are for work, never say yes until you know all the details to your satisfaction. Let’s hope I can apply that lesson from here on out!

* I am omitting any specific references to what the film was, because having been the victim of a “Google-byte” in the recent past, I’m trying to be careful. (Google-byte is my own little phrase for a situation where someone who is mentioned disparagingly on your web page or blog stumbles onto the offensive post after typing their name into Google. I’m sure there’s another word for it out there, but this is the one I like. [The past-tense verb form: Google-bit… which I guess is one-eighth of the noun form…])

free web counter
Best Buy Coupons